On 2013-04-15 15:31:38 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 04:22:14PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > So, transitions could be avoided in a social way. No need for a freeze. > > Let's see how well that works - look at the very first message in this > thread.
My point is that: whether there is a freeze or not, it doesn't work well. On the other hand, one could argue that without the freeze system, it could have worked better: here the maintainer may have thought that because of the freeze, uploading the package wouldn't have hurt the next release. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130415143903.gb18...@xvii.vinc17.org
