[moving to debian-devel as Neil suggested]
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:52:30PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> As a general hint, requests that are "obviously correct" get approved
> very quicky.
I can confirm this - thanks for the release team.
> Things that are "obviously wrong" get rejected very
> quickly. The problem happens when there's something in between.
Thanks for the explanation.
> The problem is that we keep looking at them, going "urgh" and moving on
> to something else easier. This will particularly happen if it's a huge
> diff.
Very reasonable workflow.
> This isn't to excuse not rejecting things if there's little chance of us
> actually reviewing them, but may be useful background info into the
> thoughts of the release team when dealing with unblocks.
The only thing I'm wondering about is: Will all unblock requests be
handled before the release (either by an unblock or a refusal)? I'm
asking because I'm wondering if in the large set of unblocks some issues
might be hidden if not actually connected to RC bugs[1] and thus might
be considered noise in the release process.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] If you might wonder what other problems than RC bugs should be
handled by unblock requests I wrote a mail
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/06/msg00323.html
to explain why Blends metapackages need to be created at the
*end* of the release process to make sure all dependencies will
be really fullfilled. The actual unblock for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702722#10
contained a remark from release team that makes me wonder whether
this was regarded as reasonable. If similar bugs (need to upload
debian-gis and debian-science, debian-med is uploaded #696387)
might be delayed (which I perfectly understand) is it possibly a
good idea to increase the severity of these bugs to make sure
that they will be handled before the release. I would not
consider this if you confirm that all unblocks will be really
handled (in whatever way as said above).
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130402072443.gc25...@an3as.eu
