Hi, 

On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 14:32:12 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56:52 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> 
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > > > Putting debian-devel@l.d.o on CC for this bug report, as this change
> > > > might have larger impact on installations, so discussing this first
> > > > might be a good idea.
> > > > 
> > > rc-buggy is not a codename, it's a bad joke.  Don't use it?
> > 
> > well, removing it now that it is already used will also break
> > installations, so i would suggest we make it a codename now.
> > 
> What makes you think it's used?

My grep on access logs on ftp.d.o mirrors.


-- 
 Martin Zobel-Helas <zo...@debian.org>    Debian System Administrator
 Debian & GNU/Linux Developer                       Debian Listmaster
 http://about.me/zobel                               Debian Webmaster
 GPG Fingerprint:  6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D  BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130328134136.gf31...@ftbfs.de

Reply via email to