On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:35:54PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > I wonder if someone should do a bug mass-filling... > [...] > > If I grep -v /usr/share/doc, then there's "only" 105 instances of > > jquery.js in SID... By the way, is it considered ok to embed jquery.js > > under /usr/share/doc? (I'd say no, but it's still better if it's only in > > there, as I wouldn't expect it's in active use in the package) > > > > There's already a lintian warning for this problem, but it doesn't seem > > As others say, many of them are symlinks and thus are OK. > > I agree with the submitter, it doesn't make sense to hunt down such > copies and link them and *hope* it will work. > > I submitted a patch (still unresponded to) to version the libjs-jquery package,[1] which would help in cases where newer versions don't work with legacy apps, which has happened many times before, including with all packages that use sphinx. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680282 --- Shawn Landden +1 360 389 3001
