Hi, I'm currently trying to get the KDE-Artist Team to once more dual license their Icon-Set under LGPL and Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
They dual licensed their icons in history but removed this option there've been multiple factors to do this and I was told that Debian was one of the reasons because you had problems with this dual licensing option. Can anyone here shed some light on this? Why can it be a problem to Debian if something is available under LGPL and another license (which itself even allows commerical usage)? Before I start with the monster work of going through the history of icons to find out who provided them I need to know if a dual licensing is possible at all. Does anyone here know of other parts of Debian who use a dual licensing option, e.g. Apache 2.0 + LGPL, ...? If you want to know more about the background of why I'm trying to do this. You can take a look at my blog http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/2013/02/13/fed-up-with-famfamfam-icons-for-eclipse-org-lets-get-oxygen-icons/ Thanks for your help Tom -- B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tom schindl geschäftsführer/CEO ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1 A-6020 innsbruck fax ++43 512 935833 http://www.BestSolution.at phone ++43 512 935834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/511ca7e8.3040...@bestsolution.at
