One of the most interesting statements in the recent udev discussion was Steve Langasek's claim that socket-based activation has "fundamentally unmaintainable security". A couple people have asked for clarification and I would also like to know what problem Steve was referring to. Can someone please give me the golden clue? -- Thomas Hood
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5110dcec.4010...@gmail.com