On 01/28/2013 07:30 PM, Philip Hands wrote: > You're going to have to do a lot better than saying that you don't like > it very much if you're going to convince me that Joey's mistaken in that > choice Hi Phil,
Thanks for sharing your view (and the one of Joe). I also maintain at least one native package: debpear, which is a helper to build some PHP PEAR packages. So I do think it makes sense in some cases. I would really like to hear others thoughts about this choice. Is there counter arguments for this kind of package? Oh, and I allmost forgot as well: openstack-pkg-tools is native too (but it's not in testing, just in experimental until Wheezy is out). I don't think it would need any change in derivatives, IMO, especially because they don't need an upstart job to replace an init script which doesn't exist in these packages. However, I don't really feel 100% confident about these choices, and would happily read external opinions. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5108c524.9030...@debian.org
