Le Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:05:13AM -0600, Peter Samuelson a écrit : > > In bug #695229, I noted that an Architecture: all package really should > be Multi-Arch: foreign. This led to an IRC discussion between Goswin, > Steve L. and me in which I formulated the proposal: > > If a package is 'Architecture: all', and all its dependencies are > 'Multi-Arch: foreign' (including the case where there are no > dependencies), this package should implicitly be treated as > 'Multi-Arch: foreign' as well.
Hello everybody, have there been progresses on that question ? In light of the last messages in this thread, which suggest that more than 250 packages should be converted from architecture-independant to architecture-dependant in order to solve the problem, I wonder if it is useful to start adding 'Multi-Arch: foreign' to 'Architecture: all' packages. (I ask because it was suggested for mime-support in #695357) Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130106093218.gd13...@falafel.plessy.net
