On 01/01/2013 04:21 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hi Thomas and everybody, and « bonne année » ! > > It seems to me that the main technical arguments advocating predictable or > sortable release names have been given, so I think that the next step would be > to make sure that they get to the right ears at the right time. While this > discussion on -devel may help to strenghten your proposition, I have the > impression that the current contributors to the discussion are not the persons > who will decide. > > How about a DEP to organise the discussion ? It would help for the pros and > cons to be recorded in a synthethic way in a document easy to find, which will > be very useful if the persons in charge estimate that currently it is a > development that has a lower priority than focusing on Wheezy's release. > > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep0/ > > Cheers, > Hi Charles!
Maybe it's a bit overkill to do a DEP just for that no? Otherwise, I can make a sum-up of what has been said in the list, if you see fit. (Though probably, it would be best to find someone to do it that has a less strong point of view on the mater, and with better English skills than me...) Also, I do like the fact that the release team decides for the name, I think that's a very nice reward for their huge work. However, I think everyone in the project should have equal rights as to discuss and decide *when* we need such names (and, as always, best is to have a consensus). Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e2f209.9080...@debian.org
