Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: New virtual packages: lv2-plugin and lv2-host"):
> It seems to me that you are applying more strict rules now than has been 
> applied to other names on the list in the past.

This is not some kind of hazing ritual where people have to persuade a
reluctant audience.  I'm just trying to make sure that we understand
what these virtual package names are for.  And past decisions are not
necessarily a good guide in a relatively lightweight process like this
one.

Do users specifically find LV2 plugin packages by name and install
them ?  How does it help the user to have an arbitrary "lv2-host"
installed too ?

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20652.53969.639282.165...@chiark.greenend.org.uk

Reply via email to