Thomas Koch <tho...@koch.ro> writes: > For every debian source package that enters the archive, dak should commit > the > source code to a public readable Git repository and put a signed tag on it.
I do not think that is a good idea: You would end with two repositories for packages maintained in Git. It has the same problems with non-free files in the history as 3.0 (git). Actually worse as the maintainer cannot remove parts of the history in a later upload. It duplicates large amounts of data already available elsewhere. And all repositories would have to live on ftp-master so that dak could commit to them. I would also expect Git repositories for packages including binary data like images, videos or audio to get very large. I am also not sure why dak should do this. It can be done somewhere else, just like snapshot.d.o. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pq3pepkr....@deep-thought.43-1.org
