Am 05.09.2012 23:24, schrieb martin f krafft:
> I said fglrx — because its binary-only version caused regular
> crashes and headaches for Linux users.
> 

Which is ATM more useful as nvidia prop. ones. And AMD (not the ATI in
the past) is in general interested (and already legaly checked) in
opening fglrx, but it fails with third party foo...
Anyway AMD in general is doing quite much for the OSS community, why it
is IMO fud.

-- 
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
 Patrick Matthäi
 GNU/Linux Debian Developer

  Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
        patr...@linux-dev.org
*/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to