On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 03:17:15PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > I don't think it's worth +dfsg, and CPU cycles will only be wasted once > on the maintainer side, since most of PNGs are in arch:all packages anyway.
I used to hack on the games-thumbnails package a bit, which ran optipng as part of the build stage and removed the results as part of the clean stage.¹ It used to be quite a pain to run 'debuild' over and over, if you were making small, iterative packaging changes, because the 'clean' target would be run. I suppose I could have simply ran the build stage by hand repeatedly instead. ¹ It would appear that the package no longer does the remove stage, from a cursory glance at the rules file these days. This is no doubt a pragmatic decision, but one that might conflict with people's build expectations.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120829144701.GB22300@debian