On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:18:48PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Hello, > > Hi, > > > Currently, it is the case that some packages are expecting gcc and g++ > > to be the default and (almost) only C and C++ compilers. While it has > > been the case for the early days of the project, this assumption causes > > more and more issues for folks who want to use something _other_ then > > gcc or g++. > > Just curious, do you have a list of such packages?
No, I've not built up such a list. I've seen it enough for me to recall
this edge-case. Most packages with a lone Makefile usually have:
CC=gcc
Or so. Some other packages (I remember this from our gcc-4.6 --> 4.7
transition) have hard-coded gcc versions, even though it built fine with
4.7.
So, no, but it's present. Shouldn't take too much work to track this
down. This was something I was planning to do once the general feel was
that this was a good idea.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org>
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
