Le Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:24:06AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:03:03PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > I also think that the current proposal would be a good opportunity to > > transfer > > the information about source location and excluded files in a separate file > > that would be parsed by uscan and others, and which format would be easier > > than > > debian/watch. > > I guess you mean your DEP12 proposal, right?[1]
Hi Andreas, I also considered, but the information of what files are excluded when creating the Debian source package is not relevant to upstream. More simply, I think that if debian/watch would radically change its format to YAML or the Debian control data file syntax, it would be a good place for the Files-Excluded field. And it already contains the information about where the upstream source is distributed, so for most packages, it would only take one patch to Debhelper, one to the PTS and one to packages.debian.org to get the information distribued to our users. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120825081857.gb3...@falafel.plessy.net
