On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote:
> I think the debate in this thread is about whether it makes sense to > require removing the minimized version from the upstream source when we > don't install that file or otherwise use it in the binary package (because > the binary package depends on the separately-packaged version of the same > Javascript library, which already has both the minimized and non-minimized > version and fully satisfies the DFSG). That's exactly the point IMHO, it's just one more useless file in upstream's tarball. While working today on Wt again, I've noticed if I were to repackage the upstream tarball to remove jquery.min.js, I would also remove the Doxygen-generated HTML apidox. After all, I'm also regenerating them, therefore to me it's just a few thousands of useless files in upstream's tarball. But what's FTP masters stance on this? -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cakcbokskacx5v8eqjcgqoy9sn6sd76kkkge8cmpwq-64nxf...@mail.gmail.com
