On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 08:59:55PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 16, Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > I know this is tedious but what others think about this matter?
> This is another case in which the DFSG has become a religion to be
> followed in a literalist interpretation instead of a tool to be used
> for the purpose of advancing software freedom.
I'd regard using an untouched source and using just the Debian packaged
version of the library (and thus ignoring the upstream shiped copy /
minimisation in the binary package) as "common sense". IMHO DFSG should
not conflict with common sense and if this is the case we might consider
fixing it.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120817082412.gc2...@an3as.eu
