Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: > So, Simon, if these puzzle names should be qualified to make them more > unique on the PATH, what formulaic change should be made ? My > recommendation would be "sgt-*" on the grounds that that's unlikely to > conflict, although it might of course end up with your initials on a > broken or badly-behaved derivative.
"sgt-*" is what I'd have suggested too, since it's the most sensible abbreviation of the title of the whole puzzle collection. I hadn't actually considered the risk of crappy derivatives looking as if I wrote them, but given that they'll probably still be labelled with my name in places other than their filenames, I don't think it's something I can get worked up about. Perhaps I shouldn't have named the whole collection after myself in the first place, but I couldn't think of a better name at the time and it's too late now. Cheers, Simon -- Simon Tatham "What a caterpillar calls the end of the <ana...@pobox.com> world, a human calls a butterfly." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1symiv-0003pz...@atreus.tartarus.org
