On 12-07-30 at 12:37pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Lu, 30 iul 12, 11:12:43, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2012-07-29 21:43:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > An ENABLE switch does more than just disabling the run-at-boot > > > state of an initscript. While I can buy the argument that some > > > packages should not start *at boot* by default, > > > > The problem is not just at boot, but also when pacakges are > > installed (first install or upgrade). > > > > > I do believe that whenever an initscript is called with the > > > argument "start", it should bloody well start, and not exit after > > > doing nothing because I haven't edited some scarcely related file > > > somewhere. > > > > As long as scripts are allowed to execute init scripts directly with > > "start" or "restart" (see rsync postinst script, for instance), this > > must not be the case. Otherwise there would be no means to disable a > > daemon (uninstalling the package would not be a satisfactory > > solution because the client may still be useful, such as with > > rsync). > > I'd say there is a need for: > > 1. a system-wide setting to start daemons or not on boot/upgrades/etc. > 2. a blacklist - daemons listed here should not start no matter what > 3. a whitelist - daemons listed here should start no matter what > > This should satisfy all camps ;)
That should be simple to setup, as the infrastructure exist already: policy.d. What I do locally to suppress starting daemons inside chroots is use policyrcd-script-zg2 and then add a [custom script]. That script should be easily changed/extended e.g. using "run-parts --list", and either published at our wiki or released in a package conflicting with policyrcd-script-zg2. - Jonas [custom script]: http://source.jones.dk/?p=sbin.git;a=blob;f=policy-rc.d -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
