Filipus Klutiero <chea...@gmail.com> writes: > The "second highest decision-making body" in question is also our lowest > conflict resolution body. I for one am not interested in reading the > outcome of each small claims case.
You have been heard. I've read all of your messages on this thread, and several other tech-ctte members have also read your request and the logic behind it. I also thought about your counter-arguments to some of my reasons for wanting to post the decisions. Several other people have also weighed in on their perception of the usefulness of the communication. I think there's enough information here to make a decision for right now. >From the reactions of various people stated here, I think it's safe to say that, for the time being, announcements of decisions to debian-devel-announce will continue. That's not because we've not listened to your argument or gotten your point; it's just that other people disagree. I don't think any purpose is served by continuing to discuss it right now. It doesn't seem likely that any new arguments will be presented or that any older arguments will suddenly become more persuasive (to either you or to anyone else), so for the time being we're not going to reach unanimous agreement on a course of action. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y5m9u9cj....@windlord.stanford.edu
