On 12-07-11 at 12:12pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 11 iul 12, 10:55:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > The feature of _allowing a subset of packages to be removed that was > > _ensured_ to be installed: Impossible without defeating the feature > > of _ensuring_ those same package are installed. > > Agreed. However, unless I missed something I haven't seen any > arguments for why gnome-core really needs to _ensure_ that > network-manager-gnome is installed, other than "upgrade issues" > without any other details.
Package description isn't enough argument? > This meta-package depends on a basic set of programs, including a file > manager, an image viewer, a web browser, a video player and other > tools. > > It contains the official “core” modules of the GNOME desktop. I still (as previously mentioned) believe that you really should focus on gnome-session instead, if you feel gnome-core is too invasive when it insist on installing certain image viewer, web browser, video player and "other tools" (which includes a certain network manager). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
