Hello Ian, Ian Jackson [2012-06-15 17:18 +0100]: > > I saw that coming: There would be little dispute about adding a > > header, but lots of difficulty to find a good name. :-) Perhaps we > > should think about an actual name for DEP-8 first (similar to what we > > had with DEP-5 -> "copyright 1.0 format"), and then use an > > abbreviation of that for the XS-Testsuite: value? > > Is there some reason why we can't use "autopkgtest" ? It's a pretty > boring name really and I don't mind it being reused for both spec and > implementation. That's a thing we do quite often anyway. Eg "dpkg" :-)
FTR, I think "autopkgtest" as a spec name is just fine. It conveys what the standard is about rather well in a really short name. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120619052042.gb3...@piware.de
