Sten Anderson wrote: > Now you are at it, I suggest that you also scan the archive for packages > that fails to include a "Section" and/or "Priority" field. It is far > too many, and it is quite annoying.
Do we want all packages to include the Section and Priority fields? If so, then I think it is far more effective to change dpkg's default behaviour so that it does include these fields, rather than requiring an explicit flag -isp. However, I don't know the history behind this. What is the reason for not including Section and Priority by default? Richard Braakman -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
