Hi Enrico, On 12-05-31 at 09:19am, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:01:51PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > Did you see me writing "I'd like to hijack php-codesniffer in order > > to rush and get it into wheezy in time before the freeze"? *NO* ! I > > didn't write that. > > Agreed. I'd have expected people, if anything, to answer suggesting > the correct procedure to get things done in this case. I was surprised > to see replies harshly escalating matters this way. > > My understanding is that we have a package that looks unmaintained for > 4 years. Yelling at those who volunteer to do some work on it, instead > of guiding them to do it in the best way, seems silly and rather > un-debianish to me.
Rephrasing orphaning without maintainer consent + takeover as hijacking is yelling? Suggesting to do an NMU instead of hijacking is un-debianish? - Jonas Who agrees the package is in bad shape, but dislikes hijacking. -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
