Peter Samuelson <pe...@p12n.org> writes:
> If you can think of a way to implement this same stuff (and remember,
> bash-completion supports a _lot_ more complex cases than 'kill')
> without adding 200 kB of shell functions to bash's runtime, by all
> means, do it and see how it works out.

What would seem interesting would be a way to autoload bash completion
support for each command ... as it would seem not uncommon to have shell
sessions where the user never tries to use completion for 99% of the
commands handled.

[or does it already do this?]

-miles

-- 
Consult, v.i. To seek another's disapproval of a course already decided on.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obp7aioj....@catnip.gol.com

Reply via email to