On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au> wrote: > On 23 May 2012 23:31, Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ok step for imagemagick > > Thanks. > > Just trying this out now. Anyway I can avoid gitpkg asking the > following question? I think No is the only correct answer when using > pristine-tar (it already replaced the file anyway), but I can't see > anyway of making gitpkg assume No without asking. > > $ gitpkg debian/2.4.5a-1 upstream/2.4.5a > pristine-tar checkout ../deb-packages/dar/dar_2.4.5a.orig.tar.gz > pristine-tar: successfully generated > ../deb-packages/dar/dar_2.4.5a.orig.tar.gz > git archive exporting debian/2.4.5a-1 > preparing ../deb-packages/dar/dar-2.4.5a > > You have requested 'upstream/2.4.5a' be exported, > but dar_2.4.5a.orig.tar.gz is already present. > Overwrite the existing orig with this repo export (y/N)?
No it is spurious care to fill a bug ? > -- > Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAY=1d_f3n-os30mjn7sx7ekw05rpogpxk5k_3ev_3f...@mail.gmail.com