On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Brian May
<br...@microcomaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> On 23 May 2012 23:31, Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok step for imagemagick
>
> Thanks.
>
> Just trying this out now. Anyway I can avoid gitpkg asking the
> following question? I think No is the only correct answer when using
> pristine-tar (it already replaced the file anyway), but I can't see
> anyway of making gitpkg assume No without asking.
>
> $ gitpkg debian/2.4.5a-1 upstream/2.4.5a
> pristine-tar checkout ../deb-packages/dar/dar_2.4.5a.orig.tar.gz
> pristine-tar: successfully generated 
> ../deb-packages/dar/dar_2.4.5a.orig.tar.gz
> git archive exporting debian/2.4.5a-1
> preparing ../deb-packages/dar/dar-2.4.5a
>
> You have requested 'upstream/2.4.5a' be exported,
> but dar_2.4.5a.orig.tar.gz is already present.
> Overwrite the existing orig with this repo export (y/N)?

No it is spurious care to fill a bug ?
> --
> Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAY=1d_f3n-os30mjn7sx7ekw05rpogpxk5k_3ev_3f...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to