On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:03:04 +0800 Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote: > > > In the last days, I have taken a look into how much needed to be done to > > remove Qt3 and there were slightly more than 50 packages depending directly > > or indirectly from Qt3. A removal from Wheezy seemed doable > > given that removing packages is never a problem during the Debian freeze ;-) > > Doesn't LSB compliance require Qt3 ? meh. > Doesn't look like we can drop Qt3 completely unless we drop LSB or LSB > switches to Qt4. Does LSB matter? It is an archaic selection of packages which completely useless for a universal operating system. (It also causes severe hassle for automated dependency checks in Emdebian or any Debian derivative.) Why do we care about LSB? Why do we have to have *all* the LSB packages when two lsb packages stand out from the rest. http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=lsb If lsb-desktop becomes uninstallable it can be dropped like any other package. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpcfGPqYVj4y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
