]] Thibaut Paumard > Le 04/05/12 00:29, Peter Samuelson a écrit : > > > > [Patrick Lauer] > >> 1.0_pre20120503 maybe > > > > That'd be wrong if you expect a real _alpha, _beta or _pre of the given > > version in the future. I think in that case you'd need something like > > 1.0_alpha_alpha20120503 or 1.0_alpha_pre20120503. > > 1.0~git20120503 would also break if upstream, later, releases 1.0~alpha.
Then you can use 1.0~+alpha instead. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
