Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> writes: > On 05/02/2012 06:00 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> and the binary isn't invoked directly by users > If the binary isn't invoked directly by the users, why do we have a > problem? Why can't a patch be introduced so that the binary doesn't live > in a user accessible path (eg: not in /usr/bin)? That's also an option, but the amount of work required to do the transition is basically the same either way, and in Debian usually programs meant to be invoked by inetd are kept in /usr/sbin. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d36l2qo8....@windlord.stanford.edu
