(slightly off-topic) Quoting Russell Coker (russ...@coker.com.au):
> No, bouncing mail when it can't be properly delivered is much better than > violating RFCs. > > Mail that is bounced with a human readable message describing the real cause > of the problem can then be re-sent once the problem is fixed. You mean a message readable by a human even when it happens that this human is a non English-speaking non-geek person? :-) All MTA bounce messages are just plain unreadable crap for the average human on Earth, I'm afraid. For some of them, it's even worse than Vogon poetry. (and, no, I have no solution to this, by the way...just reacting to the assumption that bounce messages are readable: they are not)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
