Le Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link a écrit : > * Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> [120430 04:31]: > > > > When we need to modify a large number of packages in order to propagate a > > change, isn't this meaning that we are not picking the most efficient > > defaults ? > > As I wrote again, keeping them seperate means you can support both > cases.
The problem is: who wants to support what and what for ? I thought that the release goal was to harden Debian, not to fine-grain makefiles in general. What I see here is a system that is generous of other people's time. If people who are interested by improving our dozens of thousands upstream makefiles could spend time forwarding patches upstream by themselves, that would be appreciated. I have a hard time finding convincing words when I think the patch is borderline useless. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120430142553.gb2...@falafel.plessy.net
