Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes: > I also am biased in one direction but shall not say which as I see no > benefit at this point in rehashing the discussion: Both packaging > "camps" have clearly demonstrated a lack of interest in letting the > other use the name "node", which means we must both step off of it.
> Just today there was progress on the side of Node.js - see bug#650343. I think that having Node.js not provide the command node would be a real disservice to our users (and I say this as someone in neither camp; I've never used either program). -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ehr7u5x2.fsf...@windlord.stanford.edu
