On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:18:30AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 20 avril 2012 à 20:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > > * Package name : hurd-cvsfs > > Aren’t you late by 19 days?
(This isn't intended as a criticism of this specific ITP.) While it's great that Hurd can support all of these esoteric translators, in terms of making Hurd a viable *Debian* port, we really only need a few specific ones: - tmpfs - procfs - sysfs - ext?fs Speaking from the perspective of initscripts, we are carrying around a large amount of Hurd-specific code, which as far as I understand is probably actually unused. Example: All other platforms have /etc/mtab as a symlink. Yet we are carrying around large amounts of code and extra initscripts to generate mtab for the only system which does not support /proc/mounts (Hurd). A procfs translator (even an incomplete one) would allow all this (barely tested) cruft to be dropped. It would be really great if the efforts of the Hurd developers could be directed to getting the translators which are of direct benefit to the distribution as a whole functional, rather than features such as this--who uses CVS nowadays anyway, let along through a translator? It's neat, but not really useful (from the POV of the distribution as a whole). Thanks, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120423084432.gq28...@codelibre.net
