On 04/18/2012 09:29 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Colin Watson > >> alioth is just a Debian-specific hosting site, not a general gateway to >> package maintenance. We're not set up for them to be dispute resolution >> for the whole of Debian, and they have no constitutional authority to do >> that anyway. De-emphasising the role of alioth administration in the >> whole of this would be a good thing, I think; ownership of the alioth >> project is often not that desperately important in practice. > > I think I'm speaking on behalf on all the Alioth admins that we'd like > to avoid being in such a position and role. I'd rather it went to the > tech-ctte and we'd just do the technical implementation (mark whoever as > a project admin). I certainly don't want to get dragged into what'll > easily become personal and political conflicts which do not intersect > with me personally or my areas of interest.
That would require that the tech-ctte's decisions do not take months or years. They are fast if they really need to be, but in such general cases the time a descision takes is imho way too long and frustrating for all involved people. I would prefer a solution which involves the ctte only if there is no other way. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f8fd452.3090...@bzed.de
