On 04/17/2012 04:38 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > The new document root is supposed to be the default vhosts document > root (there is no need to distinguish between default vhost and no > vhost). Other vhosts can be put in other sub directories in /var/www/, > like /var/www/www.example.com or /var/www/vhosts/example.com/htdocs, > just like the admin prefers it. >
It all depends what you do, but if you do massive hosting (eg, a shared hosting server), then you'll be tempted to do: /var/www/sites/$USERNAME/example.com/subdomains/www/html which is what I decide to do, but which would be too much for a "normal" use. So yes, we can't, and shouldn't force, any scheme. > In this regard, /var/www/default would be the most logical name, IMHO. > But we thought that not inventing yet another docroot directory name > would be better, and therefore suggested /var/www/html. But the actual > name does not matter, as long as it's a sub directory of the directory > for all vhosts. > As pointed earlier, /var/www/html has the advantage to exist in other distributions, so it's a good choice! Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f8d79a6.3090...@debian.org
