Hi, Thanks for your interest.
Le 14/04/12 22:30, Roger Leigh a écrit : >> * Package name : svipc >> * URL : https://github.com/frigaut/yorick-svipc/ > > Given the rather generic package name, and the fact that > upstream is already using yorick-svipc, wouldn't it be > better to continue using yorick-svipc as the package name? Sure, I can do that. > Are the POSIX equivalents not supported already in Yorick and > Python? There's no implemented alternative for yorick, and I can't find alternative packages for python in Debian. I may have missed something though. > While yorick-svipc is undoubtedly useful, it's also > quite dated; the standard POSIX equivalents to the old SysV > should really be preferred. >From what I've read, the benefit of the POSIX IPC over the SysV implementation is not that tremendous. > FWIW, http://pypi.python.org/pypi/posix_ipc/0.8.1 Best regards, Thibaut. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f89efe8.7020...@free.fr
