On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:36:13 +0200 Svante Signell <s...@kth.se> wrote:
> A question about packaging of some upstream (pre-)releases. It seems > like many DMs package new releases/fixes bugs closer to the release than > attending to that now. ... which makes life harder for everyone, so let's not do that this time ... > Of course it is a time/resource issue, but > anyway. Why not package pre-releases in experimental, to squeeze bugs > out before the new upstream release comes out? It is a very good use of experimental but there just aren't that many people running systems with packages from experimental and unstable gets priority as far as the buildd network is concerned. If there are concerns that the pre-release isn't ready, push the release into experimental and ask people to test it. > Doing that will make the > release of wheezy much smoother than trying to fix things in the last > minute (and risk that the packages gets excluded from wheezy??) Definitely. Whether the new version goes into experimental or into unstable, the sooner the uploads are made the better - with the requirement that if the changes involve a SONAME change or other disruptions, talk to the release team (and wait for a response) before uploading. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpG3GwG4aWvK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
