On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 15:09 +0300, Andrew Shadura wrote: > During my university studies I had a course dedicated to compilers > theory, but while I knew (and still know) the meaning of all those > abbreviations I rarely tried to spell them out in full, but rather was > always using their abbreviated forms.
The new proposed description doesn't remove the abbreviations, so I don't see any problem here. It seems useful to me to include both abbreviations and spelt-out versions, (a) as users might search for either, and (b) it's good if descriptions are understandable enough for users looking for something else to know when this is *not* the package they wanted, so even if all target users know related jargon/an abbreviation it's good to explain what it is. -- Moray -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1334406771.16637.20.ca...@claudin.sermisy.org
