Oh sorry. I saw BSD MIT not glibc. And I've never heard a complaint about GPL. Kernigan / Ritche
wrote C I can't think you'd ever erase that however :) Pascal might be more!
While cygwin may have a "suite" they are a private company I wouldn't bet to dl and use it without a
lawyer reading any "corporate provided license" they've wrote, my personal preference that is.
~~ True Public Domain released by by Government (ie, like the speach processing core of "Dragon
Speak") are Not always easy to find ~~ Most "free authors" believe GPL is free to use (except in
spite of authors). I do.
If they are "valued gov. work" they tend to get shuffled and end up in certain
hands.
Good luck. Sorry if I'm all wet on my eyes not seeing it !
John
Jonathan Yu wrote:
He mentions in the message that he's looking for one with a more liberal
license than GPL, so this seems like a no go.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f7782d6.2070...@cox.net
