On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:48:58AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2012-03-24 04:04 +0100, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > One issue not covered is what to do if your package already builds > > 32-bit libraries on a 64-bit system by building 32-bit explicitly and > > packaging as lib32whatever. > > The lib32* packages need to built as long as they have reverse (build) > dependencies. I suppose most of them should go away in the long term, > but this is not going to happen in wheezy.
All of lib32icu's rdepends seem to have already dropped *32* builds, so it can be removed right now. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120324095047.ga3...@angband.pl
