Le samedi 17 mars 2012 à 09:16 +0000, Philip Hands a écrit : > There is a big difference between supporting the use of something as an > alternative, and choosing it as a default -- I'd expect that we're able > to support the use of all of these to a greater or lesser extent, but > the contributor agreement ensures that many people will vehemently > resist its adoption as the Debian default, which is almost certainly > enough to ensure it won't happen no matter if upstart were 1000 times > better than every alternative in every dimension (and if that were the > case I'd imagine we'd fork it to route around the problem, as with ice*)
If this were the case, we would have never replaced lprng by CUPS. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `-
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
