On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:44:50 +0100, Eric Valette <eric.vale...@free.fr> wrote: > On 10/03/2012 11:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > In where? Stable? SID? Backports? FYI, you can check all > > of this easily by yourself using packages.debian.org. Or > > are you trying to make the point that Debian has outdated > > packages? > > I ask you a question: what are the version of the packeges in debian > unstable and in debian-multimedia.org trying to be factual. I know the > answer, I just would like someone from debian to write it down ;-) > > I know the version already yes. And yes debian is completely outdated.
Really? http://www.debian-multimedia.org/dists/unstable/main/binary-amd64/package/vlc.php Details for vlc (1:2.0.0-0.1) http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/vlc Package: vlc (2.0.0-6) so, yes there's the spurious epoch there, but otherwise that looks like the same latest version. Even if you were talking about stable -- well d-m.o doesn't have a version of vlc in its stable repository, but perhaps you're on about stable-backports: http://www.debian-multimedia.org/dists/squeeze-backports/main/binary-amd64/package/vlc.php Details for vlc (1.1.3-1squeeze6.1) which I must say I was surprised to see is not at the latest version, and is not even more up to date than the stable debian version. http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/vlc Package: vlc (1.1.3-1squeeze6) I presume that's why you didn't risk backing up your point with any facts or references. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
pgpwM4uDx3M0T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
