On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:08:00PM +0000, Jon Dowland wrote: > The features you've defended FreeBSD for (jails, ZFS) are not portable either; > which is to say, if you write software that depends on them, it won't work on > Linux.
Very true. However, the difference between the systemd position and the ZFS one is that nobody's suggesting we throw out support for ext4, btrfs, or XFS (just to name a few). I don't mind adding support for systemd to Debian, and I don't even mind making it the default on Linux. But if we end up with where the *only* working init implementation in Debian isn't supported on kFreeBSD, then we've done something wrong. -- The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by the following formula: pi zz a -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120306151242.gd15...@grep.be
