Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:57:03PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:

>> It's a little tricky because hardening-check is prone to false
>> positives (through no fault of its own; it's just a limitation of what
>> one can check).

> Didn't lintian split severity/certainty levels for use cases like this
> one?

Yeah, but I'm still reluctant to introduce tags that we *know* will
generate false positives.  But in this case it's probably important enough
to warrant it.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877gz4goie....@windlord.stanford.edu

Reply via email to