On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:40:28PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Mike Hommey, le Fri 17 Feb 2012 18:36:56 +0100, a écrit : > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:23:00PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Mike Hommey, le Fri 17 Feb 2012 18:09:37 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > sydney_audio_alsa.c:504:5: error: void value not ignored as it ought > > > > > to be > > > > > > > > Would anyone have a clue as to what the hell is happening? > > > > > > Unpacking liboss4-salsa-dev (from > > > .../liboss4-salsa-dev_4.2-build2005-2_armel.deb) ... > > > Selecting previously unselected package libtinfo-dev. > > > > > > I don't know why the buildds preferred liboss4-salsa-dev over > > > libasound2-dev. > > > > > > In my previous packaging of oss4's alsa-over-OSS emulation, I had only > > > enabled the -dev in the non-linux archs. In the current packaging, it's > > > enabled in all of them. I've now restricted it in oss4 too. Oss4 > > > packagers, any opinion against it? > > > > Oh, so OSS4 provides an Alsa API that is not compatible with Alsa's. > > It *is* compatible. With an older version of the API, which used void > there.
So, it's compatible with an API that is older than Alsa v1.0.10rc1, released 7 years ago. What is surprising, however, is that Alsa didn't change its soname for the resulting ABI change... *sigh* library authors. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120217180032.ga11...@glandium.org
