Le Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:35:57AM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit : > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Package name : vegan > > New R packages shouldn't be added with a source name that does not > match the single binary package that they produce. Please consider > using r-cran-vegan for both the source and binary package names.
Hi, I remember seeing a discussion somewhat recently; was it http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/11/msg00433.html or even more recent ? I must say that I am not particularly convinced, as I have seen R packages moving from Omegahat to CRAN, or from CRAN to Bioconductor, and renaming source packages is quite inconvenient. If there is a need to implement simple namespaces for our source packages, perhaps just "r-" would be enough ? But if we adopt a naming scheme, it would be great to record it somewhere. Unless I am the only one to not use "r-cran-" as a prefix, or unless we reach a conclusion, I would prefer keeping "vegan" as a source package name. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120214235741.gc30...@falafel.plessy.net
