Hi Ben, On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:19:40PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Where we've run across similar problems with posix_types.h in the recent > > past, it has indeed been due to the use of "gcc -I-". > Wow, that is a really insane option. However it is documented as > deprecated. Right. > > This is tied to > > multiarch, in that moving linux-libc-dev headers to the multiarch include > > directory triggered the problem; ultimately though I think this is a bug in > > linux-libc-dev for using #include "" here. > "wontfix" Would you mind elaborating? The use of #include "" in public headers is very unusual, and this seems to be the only instance of it in linux-libc-dev. Is there a reason I'm missing why "" needs to be used here instead of <>? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
