Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> writes:
> On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 13:52:34 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Aron Xu <happyaron...@gmail.com> writes:
>> > This looks not very nice, because we need to maintain a list of
>> > architectures in debian/control, and when new architectures are added
>> > the package is potentially broken.
>>
>> If endian dependend data is really a larger issue then introduce a
>>
>> dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ENDIANESS
>
> This already exists: DEB_BUILD_ARCH_ENDIAN and DEB_HOST_ARCH_ENDIAN
>
> regards,
> guillem
Even better. Should have tested in a sid chroot.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874nv0oxo4.fsf@frosties.localnet
