On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:33:58AM +0000, Wookey wrote: > Some of the issues are already clear I think (moving arch-dependent > headers into arch-qualified dirs, but leaving the others where they > are)
And what is considered the best way to share the architecture–independent headers between M-A: same -dev packages? Install them in all packages, and let dpkg handle the conflicts? I still don’t feel very confortable doing so, and it would cause an increase in the archive size. Or ship them in a separate Arch: all -dev-common package, which all the other -dev packages depend on? This would ensure a single copy of the headers is present in the archive, but it would also add yet another binary package per library to the Packages file… -- Andrea Bolognani <e...@kiyuko.org> Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
