On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:59:30 +1100, Karl Goetz <k...@kgoetz.id.au> wrote: > I don't know anything about waf not mentioned in this thread, but > would it be possible to patch the package to work with a packaged waf > instead? > thanks, > kk >
See the reasons for removal previously referenced by Alexander: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/02/msg00714.html and the URLs referenced from there. waf upstream is hostile to this idea to the point that he intentionally changed the documentation licence to a non-free license in order to discourage us. stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87liodfn3p....@cardinal.vireo.org